Effect of Different Mouthwashing Regimens on Adhesion of a Universal Adhesive:A Microshear Bond Strength and Scaning Electron Microscopy Evaluation

Authors : Ece Meral, Cansu Atalay, Esra Ergin

Pages : 919-925

Doi:10.33808/clinexphealthsci.993200

View : 16 | Download : 7

Publication Date : 2022-12-30

Article Type : Research

Abstract :Objective: To evaluate the effect of probiotic or chlorhexidine-based mouthwashes and coconut oil pulling therapy on microshear bond strength of a universal adhesive, used with two application modes. Method: Ninety-six enamel specimens were prepared using bovine incisors and the surfaces were grounded. Then the specimens were randomly divided into 4groups and each group were subjected to a mouth washing regimen with one of three agents-chlorhexidine mouthwash, probiotic-based mouthwash, coconut oil pulling – or stored in artificial saliva(control) for 7 days(n=24). After the procedure, all groups were divided into 2 subgroups, and a universal adhesive was applied with etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode(n=12). Composite micro-cylinders were bonded to the enamel surfaces and micro-shear-bond strength was measured after 24hours water storage. Failure modes were determined using a stereomicroscope and SEM analysis was also performed. The data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney-U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: No significant differences were observed between the different mouthwash groups, regardless of application modes(p> .05). There were no significant differences in microshear-bond strength, within the same mouthwash groups, between self-etch or etch-and-rinse modes, except for oil pulling group. Etch-and-rinse group showed higher bond strength than self-etch group in specimens subjected to oil pulling(p< .05). Conclusion: Etch-and-rinse mode might be preferable on patients who practice oil pulling.
Keywords : oil pulling, universal adhesive, shear-bond strength, mouthwash